About Substrate
Substrate is a largely open-source integrated development environment (IDE) designed to extend the Obsidian knowledge base ecosystem by linking it to a powerful, API-ready framework for interdisciplinary research. While Phase 1 does not yet include API access or user-editable features for the core model, these personal and enterprise-scale capabilities are in active development and slated for release in subsequent phases.
At the core of Substrate is the L-IRF (L Interdisciplinary Research Framework) — a spatial model that enables researchers to define, navigate, and develop interdisciplinary and transdisciplinary domains. L-IRF offers a structured yet adaptable architecture that research organizations can adopt and customize to power their own proprietary environments.
By embedding this model directly into the research process—in situ as researchers write and think—Substrate empowers scholars to surface cross-disciplinary patterns and connections in real time. When enhanced with AI, the system will identify thematic constellations and visualize them in 2D or semi-3D space, allowing researchers to explore clusters of related inquiry across disciplines.
As Politi (2019) observes, the field of interdisciplinarity remains in a “pre-paradigmatic” phase—underscoring the need for a shared foundational model that can launch meaningful integration, particularly with the rise of AI and the need to provide critical reasoning frameworks. L-IRF is among the first frameworks to address this gap, offering a holistic, scalable, and navigable paradigm for organizing and funding interdisciplinary research across academic institutions, seminaries, and universities. BiblicalStory is uniquely positioned for this work, combining cross-disciplinary expertise with a commitment to presenting the Greek and Hebrew Scriptures as the coherent framework for understanding all of reality.
BiblicalStory is actively seeking organizational, academic, technical, and financial partners, as well as strategic integrations with existing platforms. To explore collaboration opportunities, please contact us at request@biblicalstory.org.
General References
Baylis, Charles P. “The Book of Proverbs.” BiblicalStory. 2015. http://thebiblicalstory.org/baylis/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/Provlec082715.pdf.
Baylis, Charles P. “The Hope of the New Adam: Cain and Abel.” BiblicalStory. 2022. http://thebiblicalstory.org/baylis/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/07RisingAction010122.pdf.
Baylis, Charles P. The Serpent and the Woman. Lutz, FL.: BiblicalStory Publishing, 2020.
Baylis, Charles P. “Finding Jesus in the Old Testament.” BiblicalStory. 2015. http://thebiblicalstory.org/baylis/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/03NationalRuleCh3110413.pdf.
Baylis, Samuel A. “Argument of the Book of Psalms.” Unpublished Paper, 2022. BE2016A, Dallas Theological Seminary.
Baylis, Samuel A. “Proposal Phase 2 (Rev H): The Significance of Lamech’s Violence within the Intratextuality of Genesis 3—5.” Unpublished Dissertation Precis, 2024. Dallas Theological Seminary.
Baylis, Samuel A. “An Evaluation of Esther Meek’s Covenant Realism with Respect to Correspondence and Coherence Theories.” Unpublished RS102 Capstone Paper, 2020. Dallas Theological Seminary.
Beck, P.D.E., and C.C. Cowan. Spiral Dynamics: Mastering Values, Leadership and Change. Oxford: Blackwell, 2014.
Begbie, Jeremy. Music, Modernity, and God: Essays in Listening. UK: Oxford, 2013.
Chafer, Lewis Sperry. Systematic Theology. Vol. 2. Grand Rapids: Kregel, 1993.
Frame, John M. Theology in Three Dimensions: A Guide to Triperspectivalism and Its Significance. Phillipsburg, NJ: P&R, 2017.
Fujimura, Makoto. Culture Care: Reconnecting With Beauty for Our Common Life. Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity 2017.
Graff, Harvey J. 2016. “The “Problem” of Interdisciplinarity in Theory, Practice, and History.” Social Science History 40, no. 4: 775–803. https://doi.org/10.1017/ssh.2016.31.
Grant, Reg. “The Validity of Pregeneric Plot Structure in Ruth as a Key to Interpretation.” PhD diss., Dallas Theological Seminary, 1988.
Holyer, Robert. “C.S. Lewis on the Epistemic Significance of the Imagination.” Soundings: An Interdisciplinary Journal 74, no. 1/2 (1991): 215-41. Accessed 2023/08/18/.
Hume, David. An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding. Studium, 2018.
Klingler, David R. “Genesis 3:16; 4:1, and 4:7: A Case of Mistaken Identities?” Paper presented at the Evangelical Theological Society Annual Meeting, Denver, CO., November 16th, 2022.
Kreider, Glenn R., and Michael J. Svigel. A Practical Primer on Theological Method. Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan, 2019.
Lotrecchiano, Gaetano R., and Andi Hess. “The Impact of Julie Thompson Klein’s Interdisciplinarity: An Ethnographic Journey.” Issues in Interdisciplinary Studies 37, no. 2 (2019): 169–92.
Meek, Esther Lightcap. Loving to Know. Eugene, OR: Cascade, 2011.
O’Callaghan, John P. Thomist Realism and the Linguistic Turn: Toward a More Perfect Form of Existence. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, 2003.
Polanyi, Michael. Personal Knowledge: Towards a Post-Critical Philosophy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1962.
Robertson, O. Palmer. The Flow of the Psalms: Discovering Their Structure and Theology. Cambridge: Tyndale House, 2014.
Solomon, Robert C. The Big Questions: A Short Introduction to Philosophy. Orlando, Florida: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1990.
Soulen, Richard N., and R. Kendall Soulen. Handbook of Biblical Criticism. 4th ed. Louisville, KY: Westminster John Knox Press, 2011.
Van Inwagen, Peter, Meghan Sullivan, and Sara Bernstein. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, 2023. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2023/entries/metaphysics/.
O’Callaghan, John P. Thomist Realism and the Linguistic Turn: Toward a More Perfect Form of Existence. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, 2003.
Politi, Vincenzo. 2019. “The Interdisciplinarity Revolution.” Theoria: An International Journal for Theory, History and Foundations of Science 34, no. 2: 237–52.